page loader
 

Smart Access for Smart Models: Governing AI in Databricks with RBAC and ABAC 

As AI adoption accelerates on Databricks, one challenge often rises to the surface: how to secure models and data without slowing innovation. That’s where RBAC and ABAC come in. RBAC defines the “who,” while ABAC enforces the “what, when, and where.” Dive deeper into how RBAC and ABAC work inside Databricks, complete with Unity Catalog policies, masking examples, and a side-by-side comparison.

As enterprises accelerate their adoption of AI and machine learning on Databricks, one challenge consistently emerges: governance without friction. How do you decide who can train, execute, or view sensitive AI models and datasets—while ensuring compliance and not slowing innovation? 

Two complementary paradigms provide the answer: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC). 

RBAC offers simplicity and consistency. ABAC provides fine-grained, context-aware control. Understanding how each works, and how they can be combined, is critical to building a secure and scalable ML platform. 

Role Based Access Control (RBAC) | Modak

What is ABAC?

Attribute Based Access Control(ABAC) | Modak

ABAC evaluates the attributes of the user, the resource, and the environment to determine access dynamically. 

Attributes can include: 

  • User attributes — region, clearance level, project, department 
  • Model/data attributes — sensitivity, region, confidentiality tags 
  • Environment attributes — time of access, network location, device posture 

Unlike static role assignment, ABAC is context-aware. Permissions are granted at runtime, based on rules that combine these attributes. 

How ABAC Works in Databricks

Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) in Databricks | Modak

In Databricks, ABAC is operationalized through Unity Catalog features: 

  • Row-level filters, column masking, and execution policies for datasets and models 
  • User attributes passed from identity providers such as Azure AD or Okta 
    • Dynamic enforcement at query or execution time 

Example: treating AI models as datasets 

  • Assets: 
    • gpt4_model tagged sensitivity=high 
    • sales_forecaster_v2 tagged region=EU 
    • customer_clickstream with columns tagged PII=true 
  • User attributes: 
    • Alice: region=US, clearance=high 
    • Bob: region=EU, clearance=medium 
  • Policies: 

– – Restrict high-sensitivity models
CREATE MODEL POLICY high_sensitivity_access
AS (user.clearance = ‘high’);

– – Restrict model usage by region
CREATE MODEL POLICY region_based_access
AS (user.region = model.region);

– – Mask PII columns for non-cleared users
CREATE MASKING POLICY mask_pii AS (val STRING)
RETURN CASE WHEN user.clearance = ‘high’
THEN val
ELSE ‘REDACTED’
END;

  • Result: 
    • Alice can run gpt4_model (high clearance) but not sales_forecaster_v2 (wrong region). 
    • Bob can run sales_forecaster_v2 (region match) but not gpt4_model. 
    • Both can query customer_clickstream, but Bob only sees masked PII values. 

Best fit: ABAC is ideal for environments where data sensitivity, residency requirements, or tenancy rules demand fine-grained, dynamic enforcement. 

RBAC vs. ABAC — Side by Side 

RBAC vs ABAC | Modak

Aspect  RBAC  ABAC 
Basis  User role / group  Attributes of user & resource 
Examples  Data_Scientists, AI_Researchers  region=EU, clearance=high, sensitivity=high 
Granularity  Dataset / model level  Row / column level, execution-time 
Policy type  Static  Dynamic 
Maintenance  Simple, fewer changes  More complex, but highly scalable 
Best for  Predictable org structures  Regulatory or dynamic environments 

Why You Need Both 

RBAC and ABAC are not mutually exclusive — in fact, their power comes from working together. 

  • RBAC is best for coarse-grained control: onboarding new users by team or function, and assigning baseline privileges with minimal overhead. 
  • ABAC adds precision when regulatory compliance, residency rules, or PII handling require dynamic enforcement. 

In mature AI environments on Databricks, this hybrid approach is the norm: 

  • RBAC = who you are 
    • Alice → AI_Researchers group → EXECUTE on gpt4_model 
    • Bob → Data_Scientists group → EXECUTE on sales_forecaster_v2 
  • ABAC = what attributes you have right now 
    • Alice (region=US, clearance=high) → Access to high-clearance models only 
    • Bob (region=EU, clearance=medium) → Access to EU models only, with PII masked 

This layered governance ensures that access decisions are both predictable and adaptable. 

The Bottom Line 

As organizations scale AI development on Databricks, governance must scale with it. 

  • RBAC delivers simplicity and speed — foundational for team-based access. 
  • ABAC delivers precision and compliance — essential for protecting sensitive AI models and training data. 

The true value comes from combining them: RBAC for organizational structure, ABAC for contextual sensitivity. This layered model keeps AI platforms both secure and agile, so enterprises can accelerate innovation while ensuring that compliance remains intact. 

Share:  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *